How to Get Away With a Murderer Reviews
How to Get Abroad with Legal Inaccuracy
I saw at least iii other reviews of this TV show that put it at a 6/x for the sole reason that it is an inaccurate portrayal of lawyers. Yes, and...? Does that take away from the vivid plot and interim? I don't think anything in picture show or tv set is an authentic portrayal of anything. If someone were to rewrite this exciting show into an "accurate portrayal" of law, then information technology would only be a show about Viola Davis filling out newspaper work and occasionally showing up in court. And some of these reviewers go on to say that it is a shame that people believe that is how the court of law is in existent life. My advice to them is to go to the IMDb page of the Avengers and write a review that says, "it's a shame that every single person who watches this motion-picture show at present believes superheroes actually be," because apparently no one who is a consumer of media amusement has the common sense to know that lawyers do not, in reality, go effectually killing and bribing everyone.
No one watches a evidence like How to Become Away with Murder for a lesson in law, they watch it for the interesting characters and fascinating plot. I had to write this review to correct all of the mistaken reviews that gave this show anything less than a 7, because the overall rating of this show was dismaying to me. And to acquire it is for such a irrelevant reason!
693 out of 776 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Viola Davis
For me, its basic virtue remains to discover Viola Davis. and to admire her impecable performance. to see the labyrinth of a murder and the pressure and a story without real heroes. her force to define the lead character is the best motif to run across the serie.
vii out of seven establish this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Brilliant from start to finish!
I'chiliad heartbroken this is over only it concluded so perfectly, something a bulk of series completely fail to do! I've never rated anything a directly up ten before simply, this gets information technology! Each flavor is gripping, it is so cleverly done and will have you on the edge of your seat gagging for the next installment. The writing, the acting, the flash backs (and forwards) are all on point here. Hats off to Viola Davis, a truly awesome lead! How To Get Abroad With Murder doesnt "elevate on" or "go boring" function manner through. Another matter and then many other series fail to accomplish. This is a brilliant watch and I highly recommend. Thanks and then much for this full gem!
61 out of 75 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Reasonably ok...
Glorified soap opera...Personally,i would like to see more in depth written report of interesting criminal cases ,instead of more often than not family,love,gay drama...nevertheless ,ok time killer...
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
FINALLY A SHOW THAT GAVE PROPER CLOSURE
A evidence that ended properly in a long time even though their makeup was terrible 😂.merely loved information technology and volition always get out a bear on on me MUST Scout!.
99 out of 117 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Among Network Television receiver's all-time dramas
I have no thought why it has taken me this long to write a review for this evidence since I have loved it since day 1. Meanwhile, How to Get Away With Murder has go my favorite show on television, and here'south why: Even in a golden historic period of television, network Goggle box has been lacking original content in the last few years. In that location are too many procedural dramas and too many superhero shows, so therefore I am glad to have a testify like HTGAWM. Yes, it is partly a legal drama, but information technology is definitely so much more than than. IMO it is primarily a mystery and a thriller at the same time because every season starts with an intriguing flash-forward, showing usa a very dramatic event that takes identify in their mid-season finale. All the same, when most shows accept wink-forwards they but feature one in the premiere and practically have no build-upward to it, HTGAWM does the opposite, it features a flash-forward in every 1 of the first eight episodes of a season and plays with our mind. By the time you accept watched the mid-flavour finale itself, your mind will exist blown. But why am I telling you this? Because I am trying to underline that this show has the almost brilliant and shocking twists you could fifty-fifty imagine, and they have about 100 of those. They are executed with such brilliance and complication that you volition never get bored or annoyed by them. What is probably even amend than the bright twists, nonetheless, is the masterful acting. Viola Davis nails every single scene she is, she portrays this deeply flawed character beautifully with and so much depth. I cannot praise her plenty, she deserves every single award that exists. That is not to say that the supporting cast is any less mesmerizing, they all bring their A-game consistently. They all deserve recognition. And one concluding thing: character development!!!! And then so brilliant! The characters that you meet in the pilot alter a lot as fourth dimension passes and they all become very 3-dimensional! Simply go alee and scout this show. I could say so much more than, but simply go savour the fun and crazy ride. You won't regret information technology, I promise!
120 out of 152 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
twisty storytelling wears out over time
Annalise Keating (Viola Davis) is a sought-after law professor and a famous hard-charging defence force attorney willing to button the envelope. She selects her students Wes Gibbins, Connor Walsh, Michaela Pratt, Asher Millstone, and Laurel Castillo as her interns to work on her cases. There is Annalise's married man Sam and her secret matter with police detective Nate Lahey. There are her assembly Frank Delfino and Bonnie Winterbottom. The showtime season centered on the murder of educatee Lila Stangard and Rebecca Sutter who is the primary suspect.
This is Shondaland. The flashforward structure of the first season is challenging just kept the show different and interesting. At that place is nothing improve than Viola Davis. She shines but she also overpowers the younger cast. The biggest overshadowed problem is Alfred Enoch who is well-nigh known for a minor Harry Potter role. He'southward not alone in that problem. It doesn't help that the storytelling is not-stop twists and turns. The characters never get the stability needed to build chemical science. The second season centers on a different case and by the third flavour, I have to surrender. All the effort is used to keep upwardly with the twisty stories. Just Viola Davis is able to break through. It's just actually tough to recollect the situations for each grapheme over the years.
22 out of 31 institute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ridiculous and gay and pretty crawly
If you want to lookout even so another procedural about lawyers that's realistic or even researched in any way this is not the show for you. However if you lot desire an over the top, melodramatic, sexy, unpredictable show that'll go along you guessing and laughing and freaking out with every cliffhanger, then lookout this.
Viola Davis is amazing (unsurprisingly) and Analise is one of the most interesting main characters on Boob tube right now.
This show had ane of the best pilots I've seen in a while and the season two premiere was 1 of the best episodes of television I've seen all year (and I watch A LOT of Television receiver).
In summary, How To Go Away With Murder is kinda dumb, kinda funny, really engaging and enthralling and constantly surprising.
184 out of 253 establish this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Wow this testify keeps getting better season after flavor!
I enjoyed this bear witness from the start of the season and rated it 8/10.
Then as the episodes and seasons progressed, I got bellyaching with the constant back and forth timelines - of which I felt were disruptive and unnecessary. Thus I dropped my score downwardly to a 7.
Well, now into season 4, these timeline flashbacks and flash forwards are making sense and getting better.
The tension of this show is intense and Viola Davis has found her office - nails it season after season. I desire her grapheme to be my friend and mentor lol.
Score is at present upwards to a 9.v rounded up to a 10/10.
28 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I don't usually utilize the term guilty pleasance...
This is definitely a time to utilize it. Unlike other ABC shows I used to scout like Desperate Housewives, I never heard a skilful word nearly HTGAWM. When Desperate Housewives first appeared there were plaudits and comparisons with Half dozen Feet Under and Sexual activity & The City. Much like DH, this prove centres on a mystery (who killed Lila Stangart and how are the main characters going to get away with murder?). Add together to that some of the horniest students and professionals I've seen on television since Queer as Folk, you lot've got a peachy mix of intrigue, hysteria and mystery. It doesn't pretend to be a good show. It'due south overblown, it'southward riddled with over-acting, the plot is paper thin and the court scenes are like cheap episodes of "The Good Married woman." And it works in the shows favour. It'south so good because information technology never once puts on the front end of being a adept television show. Information technology's trashy and muddied and Viola Davis is absolutely amazing. If you're needing to wind downward after a difficult day of actual work, tune in to How To Get Abroad With Murder and savour the petty dramas of an oversexed, over-thinking, overdressed cast. The jury is out - How To Get Away With Murder is guilty! Guilty of being pleasurable.
42 out of 73 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Messy and addictive
This is a story about a police force professor and her inner circle of students, collegues, lovers and friends who each season notice themselves involved in a murder and use their legal noesis to cover upward their crimes.
Sounds distasteful? It very much is. It's messy, ugly, upsetting - and totally vivid!
The entire bandage is phenomenal. Viola Davis in particular brings magic to every scene she's in, and information technology's impossible to imagine anyone else playing Professor Annalise Keating.
While the series pushes the limits for how many murders we're supposed to have that our piffling group of anti-heroes gets involved in, the story is a dramatic rollercoaster that I couldn't get plenty of. I binged every flavor. This serial feels and then fresh that you tin can't actually compare it to any other show.
22 out of 33 plant this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Loved Information technology, So Hated It, Now I Love To Hate Information technology: A Lawyer'due south Tale
At the time of writing, I have seen all of season 1 and the first episode of season 2.
I've seen other reviews on hither that talk nearly how impossible it is to watch this evidence if you have any legal cognition, and I would just like to add together my two cents to this topic. I empathise. I'1000 a lawyer, and accept worked in criminal defence (once upon a time), and I, too, generally have a really hard time watching whatsoever legal dramas whatsoever. Television takes egregious liberties with the justice arrangement, and shows that portray the do of police are difficult to sentry when they are wildly inaccurate, and it is frustrating to witness protagonists do things that yous know are illegal or unethical. As annoying as this is, the tendency is understandable—fifty-fifty criminal law is only so compelling in real life. The assumption is that about viewers do not take legal training, and that nobody—lawyers included—will watch a bear witness where competent, ethical practitioners stay at the office late looking up cases on Quicklaw, picayune with binding machines, and trying not to smudge pad thai sauce on their prelim transcripts.
This show, however, is then ridiculous that it really rose to the level of suspension of disbelief required for me, at least, to still enjoy it. It is basically a soap opera. Trying to subject it to man logic is a pointless practise that will inevitably leave you discombobulated, shouting at the heaven about injustice or any people do one time they've discovered their whole life is a lie.
For instance, I would be hard pressed to conceive of a more than profound conflict of interest than that contained in the season i episode 10 court scene if someone bet me $100 and a case of beer (I won't describe it in the interests of no spoilers--the arraign-shifting thing). And that is just the tip of the iceberg. Every other affair that every character does in this show would get y'all summarily disbarred, fired, or charged with something.
At the end of the 24-hour interval withal, that is not the point. This evidence seems to know exactly how over-the-top it is. But rather than trying to scale dorsum the insanity in the name of realism, it revels in knocking it correct into twelfth gear. Left and right, people are lying to each other or the courtroom, sleeping around and committing felonies—sometimes at the same time—because why non? The degree of accurateness is then low that the mercury drops out the bottom of the thermometer and creates a rift in the infinite-time continuum. Information technology fails so hard it wins. It is the Hearts equivalent of shooting the moon.
So go some popcorn and get comfy. Endeavor to resist the analytical phonation in your head that keeps screaming "No!" and just let it launder over you. Everything volition be fine.
116 out of 172 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fun!
I just binge watched season one and I loved it. Starting time off I desire to say that there are a bunch of complaining critics on here that I think are missing the point of the show. How to get away with murder. It's non a show that's going to draw total reality. It'south a fun to lookout man exaggerated clever show (simply there's a bit of truth behind every bit of this exaggeration). Maybe the critics that rate the show then harshly should really watch it with a grain of salt. So many are saying that information technology'due south unrealistic. The police force schools are non at all similar this. Law isn't practiced like this. Oh grow up. The crazy twisting corrupted lying cheating goings-on are exaggerated and accelerated to go far more fun to picket. This is a fun show and I am about certainly looking forward to flavour two. Now I volition concord that there are some gratis sex activity scenes that just really aren't necessary. The writers really don't have to spell information technology out for united states. Nosotros get it. Maybe they will ease upwardly on that kind of stuff in season two. Proficient testify and I recommend it to people who are open-minded to the fact that Tv set doesn't always have to exist based on truthful absolute reality. It'south supposed to be entertaining. And this show is definitely entertaining.
47 out of 82 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Good offset
This starts out well but then all the characters simply get annoying because they are all deviant in behavior. There is no balance.
6 out of 8 constitute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Boring at the start simply Awesome all- in- all
The near interracial show e'er made, seems to be the main theme of the serial. Just the plot takes the cherry. The twists through out the story is simply hypnotizing. Even though it is irksome at the showtime, the end pays it off with interest.It seems to accept been made with a message of women, gay and other empowerment and is not at all subtle nearly it. It has Gay sex in every episode..that girls might dearest. But all these negative points are well outweighed by the the story-line plus interim. Majorly the player in the lead office "Anna Keating". Her work is impeccable. I tin't remember the last fourth dimension I failed to place the killer beforehand. The director would amaze everyone with the brilliant work. "How to get away with murder" there could not exist a better title than this.So, lookout information technology right now, bear start few episodes with patience, then drown in its magic. Neat Show!!
55 out of 100 institute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Getting Abroad With Murder
Warning: Spoilers
Having watched Shonda Rhime'south Grey's Anatomy, I was kind of expecting a lot of drama with How to Get Abroad with Murder. Nonetheless, having watched several episodes, I'm not liking the way the legal organisation is being portrayed nor am I enjoying the unnecessary scenes that act equally a filler to the script.
Though I'thou fascinated by the cast and what is actually happening, I think the storyline could move along much faster than it's current state, and that can be rectified past focusing on the quality of script and dialogue instead of attracting more shock-and-awe attention at every possible moment, especially with the overdose on sexual scenes and illegal activities of Keating's police force students.
It'southward extremely far-fetched to take the legal organisation portrayed equally such, and a classroom existence taught past a lawyer/professor who teaches her students how to be "good" lawyers. It'due south ridiculous, and the combined talents of all the not bad actors and actresses on this show are not plenty to save the series if it continues on like this.
The well-nigh intriguing part of the storyline is the murder plot, which you lot can only encounter snippets of in each episode. That'south what'due south keeping me going. But overall, it's not the greatest bear witness and I highly uncertainty I volition keep watching after we all figure out the effect of the murder plot.
If you're into a whole bunch of pointless, far-fetched drama and filler sex scenes that push button your boundaries, so How to Get Abroad with Murder might tickle your fancy. If non, then either stay tuned to come across whodunit or give up watching equally the show's non going to change.
110 out of 219 institute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Watch information technology for the twists not the reality
This show is like sneaking down at dark to eat a quart of Ben and Jerry's ice foam From the freezer. It is wonderful, just has no actual value...you savor it, just realize it doesn't do y'all any adept. As long as you have information technology for what information technology is worth, a sort of soft porn everyone screws everyone and all the characters somehow are related and guilty of something every bit the show goes on yous will enjoy information technology.
Like that water ice cream, it is empty calories. Call back you lot are Not eating a gourmet meal, so don't expect one. Sit dorsum, relax and savour and try to figure out what twist and devious plot plough is coming adjacent. Do NOT endeavor to reference whatever sort of legal reality, because you will be very disappointed...lot of liberty taken with bodily laws.
Most of the acting is very well done and I, for 1, enjoy mind candy.
10 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Trash
Alert: Spoilers
Review of season one.
In that location's a mutual saying that if you lot don't similar information technology then don't scout. Basically a way to categorize critics abroad as haters. It would be possible to merely stop watching a serial that was wholly, completely repulsive, but How To Go Away With Murder, like many such examples, carries some sparks of luminescence that keeps yous hanging on.
I wanted to quit many times. The 4 main characters have null likable about them. I was hoping that that would be the betoken. That this would be the show about amoral people eventually digging their own grave. Sadly what we got was this mess.
And of course no review of How To Get Away With Murder tin continue without mentioning the unnecessary gratuitous sex scenes that did nix just repulse me.
The only real spark of this show was Annalise. Viola Davis creates an amazing grapheme that is a neat combination of strength and weakness that makes her believable. But, sadly, I couldn't recommend this prove even for her.
And then of course there is the mystery. Till the end I was hoping this serial would have a smart ending, something to blow you away. Merely all we got was a B grade ending of "you will never approximate it was this character fifty-fifty though it makes no sense and feels like they made information technology up at the last minute".
In short I hold this series as trash and I have no want to sentinel the second season.
84 out of 173 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I of the all-time shows I've ever watched
I honestly can say that this is i of the absolute best Tv shows I've ever watched. I feel like they are my family! I'm going to be and then distressing when it ends.
61 out of 82 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Some other decent enough series ruined by the crazy.
Forget the spam reviews, ten/10 is just the rating fans give it to feel good almost loving this pretty shallow legal drama. It's everything we knew and sometimes loved most Shonda Rhimes series. Season 1 was a fresh concept, but each seasons got more than ridiculous and extremely soap-ish, with all the family/relationship dramas, and over the height twists and turns. With some characters backgrounds irresolute every season, to fit the « woke » agendas more. It fifty-fifty fabricated re-watching the testify, a real chore for me. After that nearly perfect 2d season. Too unrealistic, forced and theatrical for me gustation. And PC, too PC for its own adept. With the usual amount of double standards and what not, some viewers eat for breakfast. The madness surrounding the main actress « talent » went to such extremes... She was skillful, but non THAT adept. Only things I really liked near this show, was that sense of novelty, commencement season brought to the genre. Some of the bandage members, and the music selection (very distinctive to the atmosphere of the series, and full of hidden gems). Other than that, it's decent enough to be watched (or hate watched, thanks to some regulars and primary characters choices and reactions) Just not that unforgettable, or addictive after a couple of seasons.
14 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Comedy Hit of the Year!
The writers and producers of this prove probably idea they were creating an edgy, glamorous and sexy, if somewhat fanciful, legal drama. They have in fact created the all-time unintentional comedy I've seen in a long time. I've watched some preposterous twaddle on TV in my time, but this was so outstandingly, hilariously stupid that it deserves its own drinking game.
I guess it was - shall we say, "inspired"? - by that '70s classic "The Paper Chase" ... hotshot police force students vie to win the esteem of the vivid only cranky law professor ... merely at present, instead of butterball, white, jowly John Houseman, Professor Cranky-Pants is a feisty, ultra-glamorous African-American lady with Naomi Campbell makeup and a skin-tight cherry-red leather jerkin ...
This show has SO many things wrong with it that it must surely become a cult comedy hitting amid the legal fraternity. For example ... Prof. Cranky-Pants is too a practising attorney who alternates, apparently day-by-mean solar day, lecturing in law *and* defending high-profile criminal cases .. 'cos, like, y'all would *totally* take time to practice that ... and, naturally, she lectures publicly, in precise detail, on the actual cases she'll be defending THE Adjacent DAY ... and because she's so brilliant and mean, she pits her students against each other to come up with the best possible defence for the case she's running tomorrow - and she'll use theirs if its better .. what? come on, I bet that actually happens!
And of course, in this liberated and uncensored era, we see all the modern hullo-jinks that glamorous yuppie students and their teachers go upward to in order to .. ahem ... "get ahead" in the constabulary game ... like the beautiful male student who turns out to be gay, who manages to get vital info most the case by going to the gay bar frequented by the gay nerds from the Information technology Department of the visitor where the defendant worked ... he chats upwardly the academic (i.east. wears glasses) but cute gay Asian-American It nerd, who of course looks shiftily at his anxiety as he admits that he's been instructed by the firm's legal dep't not to hash out the case. It (virtually) goes without saying that IT Nerd's steely resolve melts instantly when Sexy Gay Police Student uses his clandestine weapon - he turns his attentions abroad from him for a moment and makes eyes at another guy ... seconds later, afterwards the obligatory "Don't tell anyone I told yous" disclaimer, they're ripping each other's shirts off and slamming onto the bed, while IT Nerd sings like a canary ...
... later nosotros see the equally sexy female person pupil who "impresses" Prof. Cranky-Pants by telling her how she used false pretences to illegally obtain totally inadmissible evidence about a witness' medical status ... instant Credit, of course!
... later, in the obligatory "feet of clay" interlude, we follow Model-beautiful African- American Underdog Student (actually played by an English kid who was in Harry Potter) as he drops over to Prof. Cranky-Pants' (totally unlocked) part, late at night, to ask a glutinous legal question - as you do ... simply something'due south amiss ... we hear some grunting sounds - and so of course he barges into the inner role where - naturally - he stumbles onto Prof. Cranky-Pants giving a head-task to an enormous, heavily-muscled, shirtless black homo ... what? I'thousand sure that happens at Harvard Police Schoolhouse all the fourth dimension!
We decided to press "stop" at the point where the students meet the defendant ... but she doesn't come to the big, comfortable, well-equipped lecture hall - oh no ... that would be too easy, and non "legal" enough. No, the ENTIRE CLASS has to run into her in Prof. Cranky-Pants' sumptuous, wood-panelled, volume-lined office, and they cram in there, in a not-at-all-stagey-and-awkward mode, lined upward the staircase, and everything ... taking notes, on notepads - as you do in 2014 - nodding sagely, or looking at each other quizzically and shaking their heads, while cute, tearful, blonde Ms Defendant gives her sob-wracked account of the example.
I know Tv set is just a business, simply it never ceases to amaze me how and then many people are willing to be involved with such sloppily-conceived, cliché-infested, badly written, poorly acted CRAP, and how network execs seem incessantly willing to give huge amounts of money to proceed producing crud like this ... and it'southward doubly galling when one considers the many well-written, well-acted, well-produced and brilliantly original programming, like 'Firefly', 'The Fades' and 'Outcasts', that get cancelled after one serial.
163 out of 327 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
What tin can I say... it's nigh a masterpiece
How To Get Away With Murder is not a bear witness for everybody. Do non watch it with preconceived ideas, do not spotter it if you are prude, do not lookout man it if you await detailed and realistic portrayal of courts and sticking letter of the alphabet by letter of the alphabet to the police force. And the list goes on...
Watch information technology for what it is and what standards it set. A fine piece of thrilling show with superb interim and chemical science, especially the atomic number 82 extra, who by now nigh every fan knows her name. A suspenseful puzzle full of intricacies going from the climax astern, until all clouds disperse and the blinding truth shows its devilish and mischievous face.
Put your hands on this bear witness, empty your mind, dim the room light, pump the speaker upward and get yourself drowned in its earth. You will come out shaky with your mouth dry.
xi out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Pure Trash
Warning: Spoilers
Information technology may be hard to believe, but there was a time in TV history where even married couples had to exist shown sleeping in unmarried beds. Now information technology seems just near anything goes. Where are the censors? How does this trash get on the air? Sex scenes, oral sexual activity, etc. The Television censors are letting more and more of this crap be shown. And boy is this show confusing. I like Viola Davis and so gave this show a try and I wish I hadn't. She plays a ruthless defence attorney who teaches a class on how to exist a bang-up defense chaser. While this lawyer & professor (Annalise) is upset about her married man'southward supposedly infidelity, she was unfaithful herself. Nobody has any kind of morals on this evidence; non the lawyer, cop or students. Possible spoiler I missed the pilot episode so I'thou a fiddling dislocated most what is going on with her students. Did they kill someone and are trying to cover information technology up? Did her husband have an affair and then kill one of his students? No idea and I don't care as I will never picket this garbage over again. If you have whatsoever kind of morals or sense of propriety, this is non the show for you.
99 out of 212 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dreadfully BAD and Absurdly Unrealistic
Warning: Spoilers
Absurb Pile of Cr--
This may be the virtually poorly written program of the 2014 Season. Information technology is so bad it volition make your teeth injure.
I went to Law School. The actual experience is admittedly nothing similar this turgid melodrama.
Viola Davis poses her mode through every scene wallowing in every melodramatic moment after some other. Constabulary Professors simply practise non act like this. Davis lacks the personal authority to effectively play this role.
Lookout this programs at present - it will not be effectually by mid season.
96 out of 217 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dissappointed
I started watching this evidence equally it was recommended highly and also had good online ratings. I REALLY enjoyed it at get-go but halfway through the season it started feeling tedious. Things got convoluted & started to get unreal. I was Actually dissappointed at the end of season one, and so I won't be continuing to watch.
xv out of 24 establish this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Source: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt3205802/reviews
Enregistrer un commentaire for "How to Get Away With a Murderer Reviews"